Someone suggested to me that I was being slightly two-faced in writing positively about something I didn't really care for, but I don't agree. The articles in the paper are not about me or my preferences, but are intended to push real ale and pub-going to the general reader. My sole criterion when writing about a pub or bar is whether the real ale is in good nick, or at least reasonably so. Thus far I have changed my mind and decided not to write about four pubs after I had tried their beer. If the pint I am served is acceptable, I will write about it, even if the pub or the beer is not to my personal taste - again, it's not about me.
As for sport in pubs, if fans can be encouraged to go to the pub and share something of a collective experience instead of sitting at home going through a slab of lager alone, it might conceivably encourage them to go at other times, although I understand there is little evidence that such a cross-over actually happens. While football fans watching in a pub can be very noisy and take up a lot of space, some don't drink very much while the game is on; one licensee told me that a few can make a single pint last the whole match, and vanish as soon as it's over. That to me does not look like getting into the spirit of things.
However, if my little article encourages just a few more people to watch football and drink beer in the pub rather than at home, it will will have done its job.
However, if my little article encourages just a few more people to watch football and drink beer in the pub rather than at home, it will will have done its job.
The World Cup, being available on free-to-air television, and also being something where people have no emotional attachment to most of the teams, is much more of a collective experience than the Premier League.
ReplyDeleteGood point; I hadn't thought of it that way, probably because I don't follow the game.
Delete